Standardize AWS ECS naming

[ferruzzi]

Part of #20296

---

^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

[ferruzzi]

Rebased to resolve merge conflicts.

[eladkal]

We also have

airflow/airflow/providers/amazon/aws/exceptions.py

Lines 23 to 29 in 1baa648

	class ECSOperatorError(Exception):
	"""Raise when ECS cannot handle the request."""
	def __init__(self, failures: list, message: str):
	self.failures = failures
	self.message = message
	super().__init__(message)

[ferruzzi]

I was away for the holidays, but I think this one is ready to go?

[eladkal]

I was away for the holidays, but I think this one is ready to go?

see #20332 (comment)
I wasn't able to reproduce what you described

[ferruzzi]

Huh. Neither can I now. I've rebased and removed the Protocol inheritance on L546.

[eladkal]

LGTM
will merge when CI is green

[github-actions]

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.