Skip to content

Conversation

@wolfier
Copy link
Contributor

@wolfier wolfier commented Jan 3, 2022

Clarify the value for sentry_on is not quoted by providing an example.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

@wolfier wolfier requested review from kaxil and potiuk as code owners January 3, 2022 19:47
@wolfier wolfier changed the title Clarify value is not quoted and add example Clarify sentry_on value is not quoted with example Jan 3, 2022
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
After that, you need to enable the integration by set ``sentry_on`` option in ``[sentry]`` section to ``'True'``.
After that, you need to enable the integration by set ``sentry_on`` option in ``[sentry]`` section to ``True``.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should I remove the single quotes for sentry_dsn as well?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to removing quotes to both. These are INI, not Python, the quotes just shouldn’t exist in the first place.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes please remove the quotes

@kaxil kaxil added this to the Airflow 2.2.4 milestone Jan 4, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot added the okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests label Jan 5, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 5, 2022

The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers might decide that full test matrix is needed and add the 'full tests needed' label. Then you should rebase it to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

@kaxil kaxil merged commit e8b5ab9 into apache:main Jan 5, 2022
@jedcunningham jedcunningham added the changelog:skip Changes that should be skipped from the changelog (CI, tests, etc..) label Jan 20, 2022
jedcunningham pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 21, 2022
Clarify the value for ``sentry_on`` is not quoted by providing an example.

(cherry picked from commit e8b5ab9)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

changelog:skip Changes that should be skipped from the changelog (CI, tests, etc..) kind:documentation okay to merge It's ok to merge this PR as it does not require more tests

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants