Implement a Sagemaker DeleteModelOperator and Delete model hook.

[hsrocks]

This PR implements operator for Sagemaker operator and hooks to delete the Sagemaker model

---

^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in UPDATING.md.

[eladkal]

Can you please add docs and example dag?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow/providers/amazon/aws/example_dags
https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/operators

[hsrocks]

Can you please add docs and example dag? https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow/providers/amazon/aws/example_dags https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/operators

Sure! Valid point @eladkal . Can see its missing for sagemaker altogether. Will do it . The failed test '
Tests / MySQL5.7, Py3.7: Always Integration Providers (pull_request) ' is not related to changes. Can you please suggest @eladkal ?

[potiuk]

Can you please add docs and example dag? https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow/providers/amazon/aws/example_dags https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/operators

Sure! Valid point @eladkal . Can see its missing for sagemaker altogether. Will do it . The failed test ' Tests / MySQL5.7, Py3.7: Always Integration Providers (pull_request) ' is not related to changes. Can you please suggest @eladkal ?

It could be flaky failure. Try again.

[eladkal]

Yep probably not related. Once you will add the docs and example I'll review

[hsrocks]

eladkal

Can you please add docs and example dag? https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/airflow/providers/amazon/aws/example_dags https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/operators

Sure! Valid point @eladkal . Can see its missing for sagemaker altogether. Will do it . The failed test ' Tests / MySQL5.7, Py3.7: Always Integration Providers (pull_request) ' is not related to changes. Can you please suggest @eladkal ?

eladkal

can you please check the code and share your feedback?

[eladkal]

@ferruzzi will you be able to also review?

[ferruzzi]

Left a few comments.

[ferruzzi]

Looks like my points have been addressed other than that new question about the indenting of the START/END flag in the sample DAG, which may or may not be a concern. Thanks for the changes.

[hsrocks]

Looks like my points have been addressed other than that new question about the indenting of the START/END flag in the sample DAG, which may or may not be a concern. Thanks for the changes.

Thanks a lot for review :) No it does not failed for me.

[ferruzzi]

@hsrocks The failing test doesn't appear to be related. The file wasn't touched by this PR and the line that is failing hasn't been touched in months, but @ashb was in that file yesterday and may have more info.

[ashb]

If in doubt rebase. In this case it will help as it has been fixed on main.

[hsrocks]

If in doubt rebase. In this case it will help as it has been fixed on main.

Thanks @ashb ! I already did it twice before but let me do it again :) Thanks for the help!!

[eladkal]

LGTM

[github-actions]

The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because it does not modify the core of Airflow. If the committers decide that the full tests matrix is needed, they will add the label 'full tests needed'. Then you should rebase to the latest main or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

[boring-cyborg]

Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!