Add oss_task_handler into alibaba-provider and enable remote logging to OSS

[EricGao888]

• In order to add more support for Alibaba Cloud(related: Alibaba Cloud support #17200), we could add oss_task_handler into alibaba-provider to enable remote-logging to OSS(alibaba cloud object storage service)
• Currently there's no python lib directly providing mocked oss to use in test, we may find a way to mock oss and add more unit tests later but not in this pr. It will probably take some more time. related: Switch Alibaba tests to use Mocks #17617
• This pr closes: Add oss_task_handler for alibaba provider #21748

[boring-cyborg]

Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check our Contribution Guide (https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst)
Here are some useful points:

• Pay attention to the quality of your code (flake8, mypy and type annotations). Our pre-commits will help you with that.
• In case of a new feature add useful documentation (in docstrings or in docs/ directory). Adding a new operator? Check this short guide Consider adding an example DAG that shows how users should use it.
• Consider using Breeze environment for testing locally, it’s a heavy docker but it ships with a working Airflow and a lot of integrations.
• Be patient and persistent. It might take some time to get a review or get the final approval from Committers.
• Please follow ASF Code of Conduct for all communication including (but not limited to) comments on Pull Requests, Mailing list and Slack.
• Be sure to read the Airflow Coding style.
  Apache Airflow is a community-driven project and together we are making it better 🚀.
  In case of doubts contact the developers at:
  Mailing List: dev@airflow.apache.org
  Slack: https://s.apache.org/airflow-slack

[github-actions]

The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it quickly and take the risk. If they don't merge it quickly - please rebase it to the latest main at your convenience, or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.

[potiuk]

Some static checks/docs are failing.

[EricGao888]

Some static checks/docs are failing.

I've fixed the checks/docs failures in the latest commit. Thx for the reminder.

[EricGao888]

@mik-laj Could you please take a look at this pr? BTW, I will fix the unit tests in alibaba provider in a separate pr, using unittest.mock to replace the real external storage during unit test. THX

[potiuk]

You need to rebase @EricGao888

[EricGao888]

You need to rebase @EricGao888

@potiuk Thanks for the reminder! I will rebase it, resolve the comments above and submit a new commit today.

[EricGao888]

@potiuk @mik-laj In the latest commit, I've resolved all the comments above, fixed minor bugs, added more unit tests for oss hook and oss task handler. Also, the unit tests in oss task handler are all switched to use mocks instead of connecting to a real OSS. PTAL. Thx : )

[potiuk]

LGTM. @mik-laj ?

[potiuk]

@EricGao888 - just the few suggestions from @mik-laj and we can merge it :)

[EricGao888]

@EricGao888 - just the few suggestions from @mik-laj and we can merge it :)

Done : ) Thx for the review @potiuk @mik-laj

[EricGao888]

Seems docs build failed. Not sure whether should I rebase again? Looks like related: #22100

[EricGao888]

Seems docs build failed. Not sure whether should I rebase again? Looks like related: #22100

@potiuk May I ask is there anything else I need to do to get this pr merged?

[mik-laj]

@EricGao888 I rebased this PR.

[EricGao888]

@potiuk @mik-laj Seems ready to be merged. Would you like to help me merge the commits? Thx!