Skip to content

Conversation

@pankajkoti
Copy link
Member

This will allow running SageMakerProcessingOperator in an async
fashion meaning that we only submit a job from the worker to run
a job and then defer to the trigger for polling to wait for the job
status to reach a terminal state. This way, the worker slot won't be
occupied for the whole period of task execution.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:providers provider:amazon AWS/Amazon - related issues labels May 4, 2023
This will allow running SageMakerProcessingOperator in an async
fashion meaning that we only submit a job from the worker to run
a job and then defer to the trigger for polling to wait for the
job status reaching a terminal state. This way, the worker slot
won't be occupied for the whole period of task execution.
@pankajkoti pankajkoti force-pushed the async-sagemaker-processing-operator branch from 67a2703 to 7c76188 Compare May 4, 2023 13:57
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 1c144ee into apache:main May 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers provider:amazon AWS/Amazon - related issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants