Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented May 9, 2023

#30960)"

This reverts commit bc7a3ab.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@potiuk potiuk requested a review from kaxil as a code owner May 9, 2023 16:18
@potiuk potiuk requested review from eladkal and pierrejeambrun May 9, 2023 16:18
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented May 9, 2023

Merged it too quickly (clicking wrong merge during the GH problems today). - we have not yet done discussing it

@potiuk potiuk requested a review from uranusjr May 9, 2023 16:19
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented May 9, 2023

I will redo and reopen it so that we can continue discussing right after.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented May 9, 2023

Also we need to revert because apparently SECURITY is part of the docs build and it failed it - apparently it shoudl also trigger docs building as it is embedded into our site.

@potiuk potiuk requested review from ashb and hussein-awala May 9, 2023 16:22
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 130b676 into apache:main May 9, 2023
@potiuk potiuk deleted the revert-security-issue-pr branch May 9, 2023 16:30
@potiuk
Copy link
Member Author

potiuk commented May 9, 2023

Thanks @hussein-awala

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants