Add D400 pydocstyle check - Providers #31427
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vincbeck
requested review from
Fokko,
eladkal,
jedcunningham,
josh-fell,
mik-laj and
potiuk
as code owners
boring-cyborg
bot
added
provider:cncf-kubernetes
uranusjr
reviewed
May 22, 2023
uranusjr
reviewed
May 22, 2023
uranusjr
reviewed
May 22, 2023
uranusjr
reviewed
May 22, 2023
uranusjr
reviewed
May 22, 2023
Co-authored-by: Tzu-ping Chung <uranusjr@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Tests are failing because of: |
potiuk
added
the
allow suspended provider changes
Member
|
Label set. Closed/reopened to rebuild. |
uranusjr
approved these changes
May 31, 2023
Member
uranusjr
left a comment
uranusjr
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Only a couple of minor ones!
Co-authored-by: Tzu-ping Chung <uranusjr@gmail.com>
Contributor
Author
|
All green and approved :) Feel free to merge :) |
86 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR is a follow up of #31135. It had been decided to split #31135 in multiple PRs to make it easier to review. This PR scope is the providers only. However, some of the providers are not included in this PR to make it easier to review it. These other providers have their own dedicated PR:
^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.