Skip to content

Conversation

@pankajkoti
Copy link
Member

@pankajkoti pankajkoti commented May 24, 2023

Following up on PR #31500 and
suggestion from @uranusjr to debug CI runners for openapi-lint static check failure
for non-committer runners, opening this PR to debug and observe the difference.

@pankajkoti pankajkoti requested a review from uranusjr May 24, 2023 09:22
@pankajkoti pankajkoti changed the title Debug openapi-lint CI error with VERBOSE=true for non-comitter runners Debug openapi-lint CI error with VERBOSE=true for non-committer runners May 24, 2023
@pankajkoti pankajkoti force-pushed the debug-openapi-lint-non-committer-runners branch from f1a675c to be45c62 Compare May 24, 2023 09:23
@uranusjr uranusjr added the use public runners Makes sure that Public runners are used even if commiters creates the PR (useful for testing) label May 24, 2023
@pankajkoti
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this experiment as PR #31518 seems to have resolved it.

@pankajkoti pankajkoti closed this May 24, 2023
Copy link

@Aknc34 Aknc34 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cengiz AKINCI

@Aknc34
Copy link

Aknc34 commented May 24, 2023

Following up on PR #31500 and
suggestion from @uranusjr to debug CI runners for openapi-lint static check failure
for non-committer runners, opening this PR to debug and observe the difference.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:dev-tools use public runners Makes sure that Public runners are used even if commiters creates the PR (useful for testing)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants