Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Jun 9, 2023

The job was supposed to be skipped when provider tests were not run. But it was not.


^ Add meaningful description above

Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

The job was supposed to be skipped when provider tests were not run. But
it was not.
@potiuk potiuk requested review from ashb and kaxil as code owners June 9, 2023 22:57
@potiuk potiuk requested review from eladkal and jedcunningham June 9, 2023 22:57
@potiuk potiuk merged commit 83ababc into apache:main Jun 9, 2023
@potiuk potiuk deleted the also-skip-sdist-providers-installation-when-providers-skipped branch June 9, 2023 23:04
potiuk added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2023
…ed (#31827)

The job was supposed to be skipped when provider tests were not run. But
it was not.

(cherry picked from commit 83ababc)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants