Skip to content

Conversation

@Taragolis
Copy link
Contributor

related: #35475

There is only single empty block exists into the Azure provider, so better to separate this changes out of the core changes


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@Taragolis Taragolis added changelog:skip Changes that should be skipped from the changelog (CI, tests, etc..) type:misc/internal Changelog: Misc changes that should appear in change log labels Nov 6, 2023
@Taragolis Taragolis requested a review from potiuk November 6, 2023 09:37
@bolkedebruin bolkedebruin merged commit 1addff5 into apache:main Nov 6, 2023
@Taragolis Taragolis deleted the azure-remove-empty-typechecking branch November 6, 2023 11:00
romsharon98 pushed a commit to romsharon98/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:providers changelog:skip Changes that should be skipped from the changelog (CI, tests, etc..) provider:microsoft-azure Azure-related issues type:misc/internal Changelog: Misc changes that should appear in change log

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants