Skip to content

Conversation

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Remove deprication param use_task_execution_day in BranchDayOfWeekOperator


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan changed the title Remove depricated from BranchDayOfWeekOperator Remove depricated param from BranchDayOfWeekOperator Aug 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@eladkal eladkal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Temporary block.

We may want to discuss introducing common.time provider. This will allow to extract several operators/sensor from core and will not put these breaking changes on Airflow 3

@uranusjr uranusjr changed the title Remove depricated param from BranchDayOfWeekOperator Remove deprecated param from BranchDayOfWeekOperator Aug 13, 2024
@romsharon98
Copy link
Contributor

Temporary block.

We may want to discuss introducing common.time provider. This will allow to extract several operators/sensor from core and will not put these breaking changes on Airflow 3

I raised thread in mailing list
https://lists.apache.org/thread/2dmlqkcmyomm4q7rrovygs6bw655zx07

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member Author

Temporary block.
We may want to discuss introducing common.time provider. This will allow to extract several operators/sensor from core and will not put these breaking changes on Airflow 3

I raised thread in mailing list https://lists.apache.org/thread/2dmlqkcmyomm4q7rrovygs6bw655zx07

Thank you @romsharon98 😊 I am happy to help on this work. Please let me know if anything.

@uranusjr uranusjr added this to the Airflow 3.0.0 milestone Aug 22, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale Stale PRs per the .github/workflows/stale.yml policy file label Oct 9, 2024
@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member Author

Closing this pr, as we have moved operators inside standard provider. #41564

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

stale Stale PRs per the .github/workflows/stale.yml policy file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants