Skip to content

Conversation

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

@jscheffl jscheffl commented Sep 5, 2024

This PR is a split of #41729 and builds on-top of #42046 and #42047 to make review easier.

It only contains the new Edge Executor functions needed of the edge provider package. The first commit is from the other base PRs and if this is merged will go-away on rebase. If you want to see Executor implementation only, please take a look to the second commit only,

@jscheffl jscheffl added the AIP-69 Edge Executor label Sep 5, 2024
@jscheffl jscheffl changed the title Add Executor to Edge Provider AIP-69: Add Executor to Edge Provider Sep 5, 2024
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch 3 times, most recently from 45b7e33 to dc70939 Compare September 12, 2024 21:10
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch from dc70939 to 57775d3 Compare September 16, 2024 21:08
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch 3 times, most recently from 0fd2bbf to dad57cd Compare September 18, 2024 20:52
@jscheffl jscheffl requested a review from o-nikolas September 21, 2024 20:25
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch 3 times, most recently from 27da6c0 to 7338f09 Compare October 3, 2024 09:49
@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch from 7338f09 to 7eb06d6 Compare October 9, 2024 20:33
Copy link
Member

@ashb ashb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pre-emptively approving, but please either address https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42048/files#r1805240595 or tell me why it's not a problem.

@jscheffl jscheffl force-pushed the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch from 7eb06d6 to 87a4188 Compare October 17, 2024 20:22
@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Pre-emptively approving, but please either address https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/42048/files#r1805240595 or tell me why it's not a problem.

Can confirm both: Addressed it and it is not a problem!

@jscheffl jscheffl merged commit 824ec4a into apache:main Oct 17, 2024
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
* Add Executor to Edge Provider

* Review feeedback + small adjustments from Niko

* Add explicit note about non-performance in current state

* Fix adoption of tasks when restarting scheduler

(cherry picked from commit 4e9c2262f567a2511d02d4acd43b821fa0df45d2)

* Optimize sync call for MVP executor

* Adjust new folder structure from PR 42505

* Review feedback: removed cleanup_stuck_queued_tasks() and added notes about performance tests
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
* Add Executor to Edge Provider

* Review feeedback + small adjustments from Niko

* Add explicit note about non-performance in current state

* Fix adoption of tasks when restarting scheduler

(cherry picked from commit 4e9c2262f567a2511d02d4acd43b821fa0df45d2)

* Optimize sync call for MVP executor

* Adjust new folder structure from PR 42505

* Review feedback: removed cleanup_stuck_queued_tasks() and added notes about performance tests
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
* Add Executor to Edge Provider

* Review feeedback + small adjustments from Niko

* Add explicit note about non-performance in current state

* Fix adoption of tasks when restarting scheduler

(cherry picked from commit 4e9c2262f567a2511d02d4acd43b821fa0df45d2)

* Optimize sync call for MVP executor

* Adjust new folder structure from PR 42505

* Review feedback: removed cleanup_stuck_queued_tasks() and added notes about performance tests
@jscheffl jscheffl deleted the feature/aip-69-remote-executor-provider-executor branch October 5, 2025 07:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants