Skip to content

Conversation

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Moving FSHook, PackageIndexHook, SubprocessHook to standard provider


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member Author

oh few tests are failing, looking at now.

@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan force-pushed the standard-provider-hooks branch from 9f984a2 to 3b31223 Compare September 30, 2024 15:41
@romsharon98 romsharon98 merged commit 61d1dbb into apache:main Oct 1, 2024
@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan deleted the standard-provider-hooks branch October 1, 2024 21:02
@gopidesupavan gopidesupavan restored the standard-provider-hooks branch October 2, 2024 09:22
joaopamaral pushed a commit to joaopamaral/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
…che#42506)

* move hooks to standard providers

* fix document build and adding hooks to provider yaml file

* adding fshook tests

* marking as db test

* doc reference update to subprocess hook
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
…che#42506)

* move hooks to standard providers

* fix document build and adding hooks to provider yaml file

* adding fshook tests

* marking as db test

* doc reference update to subprocess hook
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants