Skip to content

Conversation

@ferruzzi
Copy link
Contributor

@ferruzzi ferruzzi commented Oct 7, 2024

Follow-up to #42285

@dstandish pointed out that I missed the SlaMiss model and supporting code. This should take care of it


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

@boring-cyborg boring-cyborg bot added area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:providers area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler area:webserver Webserver related Issues provider:fab provider:smtp labels Oct 7, 2024
@ferruzzi ferruzzi mentioned this pull request Oct 7, 2024
@ferruzzi ferruzzi added the legacy api Whether legacy API changes should be allowed in PR label Oct 9, 2024
ferruzzi and others added 2 commits October 9, 2024 16:03
Co-Authored-By: dstandish <dstandish@users.noreply.github.com>
# Conflicts:
#	tests/api_connexion/endpoints/test_mapped_task_instance_endpoint.py
#	tests/api_connexion/endpoints/test_task_instance_endpoint.py
#	tests/providers/fab/auth_manager/api_endpoints/test_task_instance_endpoint.py
#	tests/providers/smtp/notifications/test_smtp.py
#	tests/test_utils/db.py
@ferruzzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm guessing I did something wrong with the merge conflicts, I'll try to get it sorted today

@ferruzzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

The remaining failing lowest direct dependency test is unrelated from the MS package and @gopidesupavan is working on the fix for that.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

The remaining failing lowest direct dependency test is unrelated from the MS package and @gopidesupavan is working on the fix for that.

this is fixed now.. you may rebase :)

@ferruzzi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Finally all green.

@dstandish
Copy link
Contributor

Finally all green.

yee haw!

@dstandish
Copy link
Contributor

let er rip

@ferruzzi ferruzzi merged commit 6c3bc91 into apache:main Oct 15, 2024
@ferruzzi ferruzzi deleted the ferruzzi/sla2/purge-slamiss-table branch October 15, 2024 23:53
@kaxil
Copy link
Member

kaxil commented Oct 16, 2024

Cool 🚀

R7L208 pushed a commit to R7L208/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 17, 2024
Co-authored-by: dstandish <dstandish@users.noreply.github.com>
harjeevanmaan pushed a commit to harjeevanmaan/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 23, 2024
Co-authored-by: dstandish <dstandish@users.noreply.github.com>
PaulKobow7536 pushed a commit to PaulKobow7536/airflow that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
Co-authored-by: dstandish <dstandish@users.noreply.github.com>
ellisms pushed a commit to ellisms/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2024
Co-authored-by: dstandish <dstandish@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:API Airflow's REST/HTTP API area:providers area:Scheduler including HA (high availability) scheduler area:webserver Webserver related Issues legacy api Whether legacy API changes should be allowed in PR provider:fab provider:smtp

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants