Deprecate session auth backend (backport) #42911
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vincbeck
requested review from
ephraimbuddy and
pierrejeambrun
as code owners
vincbeck
force-pushed
the
vincbeck/deprecate_session_v2
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9bef091 to
302e381
Compare
vincbeck
force-pushed
the
vincbeck/deprecate_session_v2
branch
from
302e381 to
3af6123
Compare
hussein-awala
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2024
pierrejeambrun
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2024
utkarsharma2
added
the
type:misc/internal
utkarsharma2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2024
utkarsharma2
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2024
This was referenced Oct 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport #42909 in
v2-10-test^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named
{pr_number}.significant.rstor{issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.