AIP-84 Migrate post a connection to FastAPI API

[bugraoz93]

closes: #42593

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[jscheffl]

One nit, else looks good.

[pierrejeambrun]

Should we handle the password as well ? How do we plan to set the connection password through the rest api ?

(And check that in the response of the POST it is properly redacted).

ATM this is done trough FAB in the Adming/Connection form that allow the password field. But this will be removed in airflow 3.0 so we should handle it in the rest API. Also the doc states password https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/stable-rest-api-ref.html#operation/post_connection but it was not handled I believe.

[pierrejeambrun]

Just to not merge by mistake until we clarify the password thing.

[bugraoz93]

Should we handle the password as well ? How do we plan to set the connection password through the rest api ?

(And check that in the response of the POST it is properly redacted).

ATM this is done trough FAB in the Adming/Connection form that allow the password field. But this will be removed in airflow 3.0 so we should handle it in the rest API. Also the doc states password https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/stable-rest-api-ref.html#operation/post_connection but it was not handled I believe.

Yes, we should. Indeed, the post and the patch include a password. Awesome one!
Let me make this work with the password as well as for the PATCH one. My mind ignored the password in the API. When I see passwords my mind just makes them disappear 😄

[bugraoz93]

This still needs some work. I am looking
Edit: depends on the work on #43102

[pierrejeambrun]

We need to rebase to solve conflicts, but ready to merge IMO.

[bugraoz93]

Good to hear that! Rebased and included the field into redact from the other PR comment :)

[bugraoz93]

Something is off with the tests. These should have been caught by the CI/CD already.
FAILED providers/tests/fab/auth_manager/api_endpoints/test_backfill_endpoint.py
I think those parts are deleted maybe 🤔 it should be fixed in #43654.