Exclude src/airflow/__init__.py when building providers

[kaxil]

same as Task SDK change in #43899 -- but for providers

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[ashb]

Makes sense, even though this isn't a real package it can confuse things if it's there.

[potiuk]

Does it mean that our packages from release are broken ? cc: @eladkal ? I guess we need to re-release them? Or do they work as usual? (I did not have time to check them)

[kaxil]

Does it mean that our packages from release are broken ? cc: @eladkal ? I guess we need to re-release them? Or do they work as usual? (I did not have time to check them)

They are good as while preparing provider packages we copy the a specific provider directory e.g. providers/src/airflow/providers/apache/hdfs.

airflow/dev/breeze/tests/test_packages.py

Lines 153 to 156 in f7270c8

	def test_get_source_package_path():
	assert get_source_package_path("apache.hdfs") == AIRFLOW_SOURCES_ROOT.joinpath(
	"providers", "src", "airflow", "providers", "apache", "hdfs"
	)

airflow/docs/exts/provider_yaml_utils.py

Line 30 in f7270c8

AIRFLOW_PROVIDERS_NS_PACKAGE = AIRFLOW_PROVIDERS_SRC / "airflow" / "providers"

❯ tree apache_airflow_providers_amazon-9.1.0rc4-py3-none-any
apache_airflow_providers_amazon-9.1.0rc4-py3-none-any
├── airflow
│   └── providers
│       └── amazon

[potiuk]

UFF 😓

[eladkal]

I don't see any problem with current rc of providers. If you find something is wrong let me know

[potiuk]

I don't see any problem with current rc of providers. If you find something is wrong let me know

Confirmed - no probl;ems.