Skip to content

Conversation

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

@potiuk potiuk commented Nov 16, 2024

When #43979 there was a typo where inputs passed as test-groups were not passed to unit tests in "special-tests" case - because the "needs.build-info.outputs" were used instead.

Unfortunately this is not caught by GitHub parsing the workflows, it will only signal it by having annotations of errors on the affected actions - missing needs.build-info entries are simply replaced by empty string.


^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

When apache#43979 there was a typo where inputs passed as test-groups
were not passed to unit tests in "special-tests" case - because
the "needs.build-info.outputs" were used instead.

Unfortunately this is not caught by GitHub parsing the workflows,
it will only signal it by having annotations of errors on the
affected actions - missing needs.build-info entries are simply
replaced by empty string.
@potiuk potiuk requested a review from ashb as a code owner November 16, 2024 03:41
@potiuk potiuk requested review from Copilot and removed request for ashb November 16, 2024 03:41
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no suggestions.

@potiuk potiuk merged commit bf124d0 into apache:main Nov 16, 2024
@potiuk potiuk deleted the fix-special-tests-for-new-ci-workflows branch November 16, 2024 04:09
kandharvishnu pushed a commit to kandharvishnu/airflow that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
When apache#43979 there was a typo where inputs passed as test-groups
were not passed to unit tests in "special-tests" case - because
the "needs.build-info.outputs" were used instead.

Unfortunately this is not caught by GitHub parsing the workflows,
it will only signal it by having annotations of errors on the
affected actions - missing needs.build-info entries are simply
replaced by empty string.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants