Move Apache Flink to new provider structure

[jason810496]

related: #46106

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[o-nikolas]

Needs one more rebase from main to get some fixes

[jason810496]

The Build documentation failure is caused by a doc issue in the Google Provider, and the Build PROD images failure is due to a dependency conflict.

[jason810496]

After rebasing, only the Build PROD images failure is left.

[potiuk]

I will have to take a closer look at that after FOSDEM :)

[jason810496]

I will have to take a closer look at that after FOSDEM :)

No worries, thanks for taking a look! Enjoy FOSDEM!

[potiuk]

OK. Easy. It will have to wait until cncf.kubernetes is migrated - when cncf.kubernetes is not yet migrated, flink has it as required dependency and it will not see cncf.kubernetes yet as a separate dependency - because cncf.kubernetes is still in providers/src as the "umbrella" provider package. Once cncf.kubernetes is migrated, rebasing this one should fix it.

[potiuk]

cc: @o-nikolas ^^

[o-nikolas]

OK. Easy. It will have to wait until cncf.kubernetes is migrated - when cncf.kubernetes is not yet migrated, flink has it as required dependency and it will not see cncf.kubernetes yet as a separate dependency - because cncf.kubernetes is still in providers/src as the "umbrella" provider package. Once cncf.kubernetes is migrated, rebasing this one should fix it.

cc: @o-nikolas ^^

Ack, looks like @hardeybisey has taken on the kubernetes provider! #46045 (comment)

[potiuk]

OK. Easy. It will have to wait until cncf.kubernetes is migrated - when cncf.kubernetes is not yet migrated, flink has it as required dependency and it will not see cncf.kubernetes yet as a separate dependency - because cncf.kubernetes is still in providers/src as the "umbrella" provider package. Once cncf.kubernetes is migrated, rebasing this one should fix it.

cc: @o-nikolas ^^

Ack, looks like @hardeybisey has taken on the kubernetes provider! #46045 (comment)

@hardeybisey -> are you working on it? This one blocks us from HDFS move and we have just a few providers left, so that would need a bit quick turnaround ? Or you'd prefer not to block us?

[jason810496]

@hardeybisey -> are you working on it? This one blocks us from HDFS move and we have just a few providers left, so that would need a bit quick turnaround ? Or you'd prefer not to block us?

I could work with it right now.

[jason810496]

@hardeybisey -> are you working on it? This one blocks us from HDFS move and we have just a few providers left, so that would need a bit quick turnaround ? Or you'd prefer not to block us?

Hi @potiuk , the moving CNCF Kubernetes PR is ready ( #46436 ) , run provider test and pass all pre-commit in local.

[hardeybisey]

@hardeybisey -> are you working on it? This one blocks us from HDFS move and we have just a few providers left, so that would need a bit quick turnaround ? Or you'd prefer not to block us?

I could work with it right now.

@jason810496 I was running into some issues while moving it and plan to pick it up later tonight. You can pick it up if you are able to work on it immediately.