feat: Add helper for OpenLineage version check

[kacpermuda]

Some providers, such as Snowflake and DBT Cloud, do not require an OpenLineage provider but may offer optional features that depend on it. These features are generally available starting from a specific version of the OpenLineage provider or client. This decorator helps ensure compatibility, preventing import errors and providing clear logs about version requirements.

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in newsfragments.

[eladkal]

This makes openlineage behave differently from other providers.
We always raise AirflowOptionalProviderFeatureException when there is problem with version.
Even in openlineage itself

airflow/providers/dbt/cloud/src/airflow/providers/dbt/cloud/utils/openlineage.py

Lines 76 to 82 in b2c646a

	try:
	from airflow.providers.openlineage.conf import namespace
	except ModuleNotFoundError as e:
	from airflow.exceptions import AirflowOptionalProviderFeatureException
	msg = "Please install `apache-airflow-providers-openlineage>=1.7.0`"
	raise AirflowOptionalProviderFeatureException(e, msg)

[eladkal]

i wonder if we can change require_openlineage_version to require_provider_version(provider=...)
and create a more generic interface for all providers that implement the function

[kacpermuda]

So these two errors ValueError and TypeError are related to how this decorator is used. If the OL version if incompatible, we simply log and return None. Do you think we should raise this AirflowOptionalProviderFeatureException in such cases?

[kacpermuda]

Any Exceptions raised during OL's extraction are caught by OL anyway, so the result would be similar.

[eladkal]

If there is a provider version incompatibility we should raise AirflowOptionalProviderFeatureException

[kacpermuda]

Changed it and added generic checker in this PR: #47909. Could you check if that's satisfying solution?