[v3-0-test] Better handling missing airflow package doc inventories (#54464) #54473
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…54464) When airflow package inventories cannot be downloaded (for example because they were deleted) we can always rebuild them locally from sources. This might happen for example when our "main" developer documentation published in `apache-airflow-docs` is accidentally or purposefully deleted (for example to refresh it from scratch). This can also happen when we have a new provider and it has never been published, or when we add new distribution that has not yet had a documentation built (such as task-sdk, or airflowctl in the future). This PR updates the existing mechanism to: * not only handle missing "apache-airflow-" packages but also the other airflow packages that do not follow this naming convention * adds better diagnostics so that if we miss to add a distribution in the future we know what to do (cherry picked from commit 8d311c7) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
kaxil
force-pushed
the
backport-8d311c7-v3-0-test
branch
from
379044d to
49556b5
Compare
kaxil
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 18, 2025
…54464) (#54473) When airflow package inventories cannot be downloaded (for example because they were deleted) we can always rebuild them locally from sources. This might happen for example when our "main" developer documentation published in `apache-airflow-docs` is accidentally or purposefully deleted (for example to refresh it from scratch). This can also happen when we have a new provider and it has never been published, or when we add new distribution that has not yet had a documentation built (such as task-sdk, or airflowctl in the future). This PR updates the existing mechanism to: * not only handle missing "apache-airflow-" packages but also the other airflow packages that do not follow this naming convention * adds better diagnostics so that if we miss to add a distribution in the future we know what to do (cherry picked from commit 8d311c7) Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk <jarek@potiuk.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When airflow package inventories cannot be downloaded (for example
because they were deleted) we can always rebuild them locally from
sources. This might happen for example when our "main" developer
documentation published in
apache-airflow-docsis accidentallyor purposefully deleted (for example to refresh it from scratch).
This can also happen when we have a new provider and it has never
been published, or when we add new distribution that has not yet
had a documentation built (such as task-sdk, or airflowctl in
the future).
This PR updates the existing mechanism to:
not only handle missing "apache-airflow-" packages but also the
other airflow packages that do not follow this naming convention
adds better diagnostics so that if we miss to add a distribution
in the future we know what to do
(cherry picked from commit 8d311c7)
Co-authored-by: Jarek Potiuk jarek@potiuk.com