[AIRFLOW-4899] Fix get_dataset_list from bigquery hook to return next…#5565
[AIRFLOW-4899] Fix get_dataset_list from bigquery hook to return next…#5565benjamingrenier wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
Conversation
|
Maybe out of scope but it still won't necessarily give all datasets. |
|
Thanks for your comment. I added the parameter |
|
Travis is sad |
|
Are you planning to continue working on this change? This week, I would like to deal with PR reviews related to GCP. I would be happy if you would respond to all comments |
|
Yes I will work on this change soon, but I have some mistakes with my docker to run unit tests locally. |
I ran unit tests locally and all succeed for tests.contrib.hooks.test_bigquery_hook.TestDatasetsOperations. |
Sorry, I found my mistake. I append an array in array. I fixed it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What do you think about using the list_next method here? This will simplify the code.
Example:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/airflow/contrib/hooks/gcp_transfer_hook.py#L201-L206
|
@benjamingrenier flake8 is sad ;_; |
ea7560e to
06dae40
Compare
|
Hi. I have prepared a commit for you. |
06dae40 to
e634388
Compare
Thanks it's done. |
e634388 to
e670a3e
Compare
|
Hi. I made a change in the base class - GoogleCloudBaseHook. Your PR may need to be changed. Could you do rebase? Cheers Reference: |
Ok I will do that. |
e670a3e to
14d8e21
Compare
What rebase do you excepted ? On airflow/master ? |
|
Yes. Please do rebase on latest apache/master. |
Thanks, but how do you proceed to make that properly ? |
|
See CONTRIBUTING guide: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#pull-request-guidelines - it has the link explaining how to rebase. |
|
Sam here @benjamingrenier -> we want to play nice and move the operators only after we merge outstanding requests so it would be great if you can rebase this PR on top of apache/master. |
4efff72 to
91d0857
Compare
4192043 to
a8471aa
Compare
|
I done the rebase on airflow/master such as you expect no?
Le sam. 7 sept. 2019 à 17:31, Jarek Potiuk <notifications@github.com> a
écrit :
… ***@***.**** requested changes on this pull request.
Will approve after rebase.
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5565?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMS27S4J2NDMKZPQOAMSUPDQIPCOLA5CNFSM4IBV3MLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWFIHK3DMKJSXC5LFON2FEZLWNFSXPKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOCD7XFOI#pullrequestreview-285176505>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMS27SYSEDSP3XN5TVDQKOLQIPCOLANCNFSM4IBV3MLA>
.
|
|
Same here @benjamingrenier :(. Rebase is needed. |
a8471aa to
2146e77
Compare
Rebase done, but I don't understand why there are errors ? |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
|
@potiuk wasn't this mergable? the failed test was just a timeout. |
|
@benjamingrenier did you stop working on this PR ? seems like it was marked stale by mistake |
|
Yes it was a mistake I will rebases it soon.
Le mar. 10 déc. 2019 à 08:32, OmerJog <notifications@github.com> a écrit :
… @benjamingrenier <https://github.com/benjamingrenier> did you stop
working on this PR ? seems like it was marked stale by mistake
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5565?email_source=notifications&email_token=AMS27SZWNXIOXDNX5GW3Z6DQX5AZ5A5CNFSM4IBV3MLKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGOIBVA#issuecomment-563904724>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMS27S75U32WX4CP6A4VDD3QX5AZ5ANCNFSM4IBV3MLA>
.
|
|
Done : #6780 |
Next page token used and max results parameter too. The method
get_datasets_listcan return more than 50 datasets.