Removed unused parameter in logout

[vincbeck]

---

^ Add meaningful description above
Read the Pull Request Guidelines for more information.
In case of fundamental code changes, an Airflow Improvement Proposal (AIP) is needed.
In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the ASF 3rd Party License Policy.
In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in a newsfragment file, named {pr_number}.significant.rst or {issue_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments.

[jscheffl]

Looks ok - BUT - this is touching the "stable" API. Even though 99% used only for UI, is this a breaking change where we need to keep the unused param for compatibility? How is you are using an "old" client with generated code against the previous API spec? The call would fail with excess parameters? Or will excess parameters be accepted?

[vincbeck]

Looks ok - BUT - this is touching the "stable" API. Even though 99% used only for UI, is this a breaking change where we need to keep the unused param for compatibility? How is you are using an "old" client with generated code against the previous API spec? The call would fail with excess parameters? Or will excess parameters be accepted?

That's a good call but this parameter is also not used so ... I do not know. Let's hear what others think

[potiuk]

That's a good call but this parameter is also not used so ... I do not know. Let's hear what others think

I think extra parameters specified in URL are simply ignored by FastAPI (to be checked) so technically speaking this is not a breaking change.

[jason810496]

Thanks for the cleanup!

I think extra parameters specified in URL are simply ignored by FastAPI (to be checked) so technically speaking this is not a breaking change.

Yes, this PR isn't a breaking change IMO.

Actually #56633 is kind of the breaking change for user because we replace the frontend side Cookie with HTTP-only Cookie. ( Some contributors reported that they need to clear the browser cache after #56633 had merged, but it should not be a big problem for users)