-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
ARROW-12709: [C++] Add binary_join_element_wise #10520
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c188236
ARROW-12709: [C++] Add var_args_join
lidavidm 6a0e497
ARROW-12709: [C++] Clarify docs for var_args_join
lidavidm 061e3e6
ARROW-12709: [C++] Rename to binary_join_element_wise
lidavidm bd878f5
ARROW-12709: [C++] Rename to min/max_element_wise
lidavidm c3f20e5
ARROW-12709: [C++] Add benchmark and debug checks
lidavidm 1a1ff7c
ARROW-12709: [C++] Parameterize benchmark
lidavidm d85e362
ARROW-12709: [C++] Improve few-columns case at expense of many-columns
lidavidm 3e960d0
ARROW-12709: [C++] Run benchmark with more elements
lidavidm 491d41a
Use same number of rows as in binary_join benchmark
pitrou File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit, but I think we should avoid ALL_CAPS because of potential conflicts with third-party macros. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was trying to stay consistent with the existing enums. (Also see: the whole ML discussion…)
If we reach a consensus there I'm happy to rename all the enums.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's some other things I noticed in ARROW-13025 like a toplevel enum (not enum class).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I think FunctionOptions classes and enums are recent enough that we may want to do a cleanup pass on them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(as a separate JIRA, of course!)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ARROW-13093