Skip to content

Conversation

@kou
Copy link
Member

@kou kou commented Sep 12, 2017

Before:

  • arrow-glib/field.h depends on arrow-glib/data-type.h
  • arrow-glib/data-type.h depends on arrow-glib/field.h

After:

  • arrow-glib/field.h depends on arrow-glib/basic-data-type.h
  • arrow-glib/basic-data-type.h doesn't depend on arrow-glib/field.h
  • arrow-glib/composite-data-type.h depends on
    arrow-glib/basic-data-type.h and
    arrow-glib/composite-data-type.h

Before:

  * arrow-glib/field.h depends on arrow-glib/data-type.h
  * arrow-glib/data-type.h depends on arrow-glib/field.h

After:

  * arrow-glib/field.h depends on arrow-glib/basic-data-type.h
  * arrow-glib/basic-data-type.h doesn't depend on arrow-glib/field.h
  * arrow-glib/composite-data-type.h depends on
    arrow-glib/basic-data-type.h and
    arrow-glib/composite-data-type.h
Copy link
Member

@wesm wesm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1. Looks like there's an error with the doc build. I'm going to look at the macOS failure since the release candidate needs to go out today

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Sep 12, 2017

Oh... I'm checking now.
And I'm also working on failure on macOS at https://github.com/kou/arrow/tree/glib-travis-macos .

@wesm
Copy link
Member

wesm commented Sep 12, 2017

ah ok, I'll wait for you and enjoy some coffee, then. thanks @kou! =)

@Humbedooh
Copy link
Member

One last test :3

@Humbedooh
Copy link
Member

bah

@Humbedooh
Copy link
Member

blu blu blu

@Humbedooh
Copy link
Member

hmm

@kou
Copy link
Member Author

kou commented Sep 12, 2017

It works again.
Failure on macOS is handled on #1092.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in b77af1a Sep 12, 2017
@kou kou deleted the glib-resolve-recursive-dependency branch September 13, 2017 02:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants