-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
ARROW-12063: [C++] Add null placement option to sort functions #11212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
|
|
@ursabot please benchmark |
|
Benchmark runs are scheduled for baseline = 3317f83 and contender = d30564a. Results will be available as each benchmark for each run completes. |
lidavidm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks for pushing through all this.
|
LGTM, thank you! I'm curious why use a |
|
Even if we don't plan on extending the enum, personally I find something like |
|
Got it, makes sense, thanks. |
| for String arrays). | ||
|
|
||
| * \(4) The input must be an array. The default order is ascending. | ||
| * \(3) The input must be an array. The default order is ascending. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding here: "By default, nulls and NaNs come after any non-null values."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's already above in the section summary.
Closes apache#11212 from pitrou/ARROW-12063-sort-null-placement Authored-by: Antoine Pitrou <antoine@python.org> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
No description provided.