-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
GH-35728: [CI][Python] Move test_total_bytes_allocated to a subprocess to improve reliability #36355
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…process to improve reliability
|
|
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-manylinux-* |
|
Revision: 0806a80 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-020f7043d9 |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-manylinux-2014-*-arm64 |
|
Revision: 4d3d57e Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-8d319d3cbd
|
|
@github-actions crossbow submit wheel-manylinux-2014-cp310-arm64 |
|
Revision: 4d3d57e Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-5976a03430
|
|
the flaky failures seem unrelated to this test now but to s3 |
|
@github-actions crossbow submit -g python |
|
Revision: 4d3d57e Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-b168c1dadc |
|
@pitrou are you ok merging this? All the failures are known unrelated nightly failures |
|
@raulcd Yes, please merge! |
|
Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmark runs on commit There were 3 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
The full Conbench report has more details. |
Rationale for this change
Currently some conda and wheels jobs are failing due to this error:
What changes are included in this PR?
As suggested on the issue trying to move this test to a subprocess to see if it improves reliabilit.
Are these changes tested?
Archery and CI
Are there any user-facing changes?
No
test_total_bytes_allocatedfailing on CI #35728