GH-38648: [Java] Regenerate Flatbuffers#38650
Conversation
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java |
|
|
|
Revision: dd33346 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-286578af8f |
|
The Java Jar failures on Mac exists on I'll file a separate issue for this. |
|
FYI, for C++/Go, we are using |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 1f71014. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 1 possible false positive for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
### Rationale for this change Regenerate the Flatbuffers to include new formats. Flatbuffers are always forwards/backwards compatible as long as the code is generated from the same `flatc` compiler version. ### What changes are included in this PR? * Flatbuffers regenerated with `flatc` v1.12.0 ### Are these changes tested? Yes, via unit tests. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes, RecordBatch.java was modified. * Closes: apache#38648 Authored-by: Dane Pitkin <dane@voltrondata.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
### Rationale for this change Regenerate the Flatbuffers to include new formats. Flatbuffers are always forwards/backwards compatible as long as the code is generated from the same `flatc` compiler version. ### What changes are included in this PR? * Flatbuffers regenerated with `flatc` v1.12.0 ### Are these changes tested? Yes, via unit tests. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes, RecordBatch.java was modified. * Closes: apache#38648 Authored-by: Dane Pitkin <dane@voltrondata.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
### Rationale for this change Regenerate the Flatbuffers to include new formats. Flatbuffers are always forwards/backwards compatible as long as the code is generated from the same `flatc` compiler version. ### What changes are included in this PR? * Flatbuffers regenerated with `flatc` v1.12.0 ### Are these changes tested? Yes, via unit tests. ### Are there any user-facing changes? Yes, RecordBatch.java was modified. * Closes: apache#38648 Authored-by: Dane Pitkin <dane@voltrondata.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
Rationale for this change
Regenerate the Flatbuffers to include new formats. Flatbuffers are always forwards/backwards compatible as long as the code is generated from the same
flatccompiler version.What changes are included in this PR?
flatcv1.12.0Are these changes tested?
Yes, via unit tests.
Are there any user-facing changes?
Yes, RecordBatch.java was modified.