MINOR: [Java] Bump com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core from 2.4.0 to 2.24.0 in /java #39452
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Bumps [com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core](https://github.com/google/error-prone) from 2.4.0 to 2.24.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/google/error-prone/releases) - [Commits](google/error-prone@v2.4.0...v2.24.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: com.google.errorprone:error_prone_core dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Contributor
Author
|
@github-actions crossbow submit java |
|
Revision: d3d3308 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-7ab1030fc9
|
Contributor
Author
|
@lidavidm does this change make sense? |
lidavidm
approved these changes
Jan 4, 2024
github-actions
bot
added
awaiting merge
lidavidm
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2024
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 42b995b. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 6 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
5 tasks
dgreiss
pushed a commit
to dgreiss/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 19, 2024
…to 2.24.0 in /java (apache#39452) ### Rationale for this change This is a draft PR for fixing the dependabot PR apache#39409 ### What changes are included in this PR? Upgrading `com.google.errorprone` to 2.24.0 for JDK11+ and restricting `com.google.errorprone` to 2.10 to JDK8. ### Are these changes tested? N/A. CIs are implicitly testing this including existing test cases. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No Lead-authored-by: vibhatha <vibhatha@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
pribor
pushed a commit
to GlobalWebIndex/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2025
…to 2.24.0 in /java (apache#39452) ### Rationale for this change This is a draft PR for fixing the dependabot PR apache#39409 ### What changes are included in this PR? Upgrading `com.google.errorprone` to 2.24.0 for JDK11+ and restricting `com.google.errorprone` to 2.10 to JDK8. ### Are these changes tested? N/A. CIs are implicitly testing this including existing test cases. ### Are there any user-facing changes? No Lead-authored-by: vibhatha <vibhatha@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: David Li <li.davidm96@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
This is a draft PR for fixing the dependabot PR #39409
What changes are included in this PR?
Upgrading
com.google.errorproneto 2.24.0 for JDK11+ and restrictingcom.google.errorproneto 2.10 to JDK8.Are these changes tested?
N/A. CIs are implicitly testing this including existing test cases.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No