Skip to content

Conversation

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor

@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 commented Apr 30, 2024

Rationale for this change

See #41463 and #40237 (comment)

What changes are included in this PR?

Skip test for platforms that have no threading support.

Are these changes tested?

Change is test.

Are there any user-facing changes?

None.

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @jorisvandenbossche

@raulcd
Copy link
Member

raulcd commented Apr 30, 2024

Can we create an issue for this? This is not MINOR and it is currently failing on the 16.1.0 maintenance branch. It should be cherry-picked and for it to be cherry-picked and milestoned correctly we require an issue.

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

This should not be on 16.1.0, though?

@zanmato1984 zanmato1984 changed the title MINOR: [C++] Skip TestConcurrentFillFromScalar for platforms without threading support GH-41463: [C++] Skip TestConcurrentFillFromScalar for platforms without threading support Apr 30, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

⚠️ GitHub issue #41463 has been automatically assigned in GitHub to PR creator.

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Or was it added explicitly to 16.1 because of fixing a data race?

@zanmato1984
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can we create an issue for this? This is not MINOR and it is currently failing on the 16.1.0 maintenance branch. It should be cherry-picked and for it to be cherry-picked and milestoned correctly we require an issue.

Thanks for reminding. I've filed #41463 and updated the PR description. Sorry for the trouble.

@raulcd
Copy link
Member

raulcd commented Apr 30, 2024

Or was it added explicitly to 16.1 because of fixing a data race?

It was tagged as 16.1.0 and is to was a bug fix to fix the data race I cherry-picked it. Wasn't that expected to be on the release?

@github-actions github-actions bot added awaiting committer review Awaiting committer review and removed awaiting review Awaiting review labels Apr 30, 2024
@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

@github-actions crossbow submit test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-emscripten

@github-actions
Copy link

Revision: bb87a96

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-8dd2f94f75

Task Status
test-ubuntu-22.04-cpp-emscripten GitHub Actions

@jorisvandenbossche
Copy link
Member

Thanks @zanmato1984 for the quick follow-up

@github-actions github-actions bot added the awaiting merge Awaiting merge label May 1, 2024
@conbench-apache-arrow
Copy link

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 7 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 2502915.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 13 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.

raulcd pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
…ut threading support (#41461)

### Rationale for this change

See #41463 and #40237 (comment)

### What changes are included in this PR?

Skip test for platforms that have no threading support.

### Are these changes tested?

Change is test.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

None.

* GitHub Issue: #41463

Authored-by: Ruoxi Sun <zanmato1984@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
vibhatha pushed a commit to vibhatha/arrow that referenced this pull request May 25, 2024
… without threading support (apache#41461)

### Rationale for this change

See apache#41463 and apache#40237 (comment)

### What changes are included in this PR?

Skip test for platforms that have no threading support.

### Are these changes tested?

Change is test.

### Are there any user-facing changes?

None.

* GitHub Issue: apache#41463

Authored-by: Ruoxi Sun <zanmato1984@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <jorisvandenbossche@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants