GH-42128: [Packaging][CentOS] Migrate CentOS 7 and CentOS Stream 8 packaging jobs to use vault.centos.org

[amoeba]

Rationale for this change

Fixes #42128.

What changes are included in this PR?

• Updates to the CentOS 7 and CentOS Stream 8 Dockerfiles we use in the Crossbow packaging job to point to vault.centos.org so they continue to run now that both distros are EOL

Are these changes tested?

Yes, I successfully built both updated Dockerfiles locally.

Are there any user-facing changes?

No.

• GitHub Issue: [Packaging][CentOS] Migrate CentOS 7 and CentOS Stream 8 packaging jobs to use vault.centos.org #42128

[kou]

@github-actions crossbow submit centos-*

[github-actions]

Revision: a9bba3e

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-3ae3be72c2

Task	Status
centos-7-amd64
centos-8-stream-amd64
centos-8-stream-arm64
centos-9-stream-amd64
centos-9-stream-arm64

[kou]

Could you also update dev/tasks/linux-packages/apache-arrow-release/yum/centos-{7,8-stream}/Dockerfile?

[amoeba]

@github-actions crossbow submit centos-*

[github-actions]

Revision: 50da9a9

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-795dd72b79

Task	Status
centos-7-amd64
centos-8-stream-amd64
centos-8-stream-arm64
centos-9-stream-amd64
centos-9-stream-arm64

[amoeba]

@github-actions crossbow submit centos-*

[github-actions]

Revision: bf74e58

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-e9c10fdd24

Task	Status
centos-7-amd64
centos-8-stream-amd64
centos-8-stream-arm64
centos-9-stream-amd64
centos-9-stream-arm64

[kou]

It seems that we need the same change in https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/main/dev/release/verify-yum.sh too.

[kou]

https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/9494341888/job/26164504184#step:11:155

docker run --log-driver none --rm --security-opt seccomp=unconfined --volume /home/runner/work/crossbow/crossbow/arrow:/host:delegated --attach STDOUT --attach STDERR quay.io/centos/centos:stream8 /host/dev/release/verify-yum.sh 17.0.0.dev327 local
Unable to find image 'quay.io/centos/centos:stream8' locally
stream8: Pulling from centos/centos
3ca969c7b6d7: Already exists
Digest: sha256:20da069d4f8126c4517ee563e6e723d4cbe79ff62f6c4597f753478af91a09a3
Status: Downloaded newer image for quay.io/centos/centos:stream8
...
  + dnf install -y --enablerepo=powertools /host/dev/release/../../dev/tasks/linux-packages/yum/repositories/centos/8-stream/x86_64/Packages/apache-arrow-release-17.0.0.dev327-1.el8.noarch.rpm
  CentOS Stream 8 - AppStream                     152  B/s |  38  B     00:00    
  Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'appstream': Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: No URLs in mirrorlist

[amoeba]

@github-actions crossbow submit centos-*

[github-actions]

Revision: 1d4e70d

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4b08fb209c

Task	Status
centos-7-amd64
centos-8-stream-amd64
centos-8-stream-arm64
centos-9-stream-amd64
centos-9-stream-arm64

[amoeba]

Looks like the crossbow jobs are all going to pass. I pushed one commit after I ran them that shouldn't need re-running. Feel free to suggest tweaks to how I went about the change in verify-yum.sh.

[kou]

@github-actions crossbow submit centos-*

[github-actions]

Revision: 504a36a

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-4569e9bfdb

Task	Status
centos-7-amd64
centos-8-stream-amd64
centos-8-stream-arm64
centos-9-stream-amd64
centos-9-stream-arm64

[amoeba]

@github-actions crossbow submit centos-9-*

[github-actions]

Revision: 504a36a

Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-fe38636a58

Task	Status
centos-9-stream-amd64
centos-9-stream-arm64

[amoeba]

The second to last run of one of the centos-9-stream jobs failed with an error that made it look like the job got canceled so I re-ran them and everything is passing now.

[kou]

+1

[conbench-apache-arrow]

After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 69e8a78.

There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉

The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 7 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.