Skip to content

Conversation

@davorbonaci
Copy link
Member

  • Use Beam SDK naming, instead of Dataflow SDK.
  • Fix version lookup, so it correctly identifies the version.

R: @lukecwik

* Use Beam SDK naming, instead of Dataflow SDK.
* Fix version lookup, so it correctly identifies the version.
private static final Logger LOG = LoggerFactory.getLogger(DataflowReleaseInfo.class);

private static final String DATAFLOW_PROPERTIES_PATH =
"/org.apache.beam/sdk/sdk.properties";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please rename file to BeamReleaseInfo or just ReleaseInfo

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@davorbonaci
Copy link
Member Author

PTAL.

@lukecwik
Copy link
Member

LGTM

Would be better with test since would have caught the original break.
Also we could rely on the file always being there and slightly simplify the code.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 7465edb Apr 22, 2016
@davorbonaci davorbonaci deleted the version branch June 17, 2016 23:04
iemejia pushed a commit to iemejia/beam that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2018
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants