Skip to content

Conversation

@swegner
Copy link
Contributor

@swegner swegner commented May 16, 2016

Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution
quickly and easily:

  • Make sure the PR title is formatted like:
    [BEAM-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request
  • Make sure tests pass via mvn clean verify. (Even better, enable
    Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes).
  • Replace <Jira issue #> in the title with the actual Jira issue
    number, if there is one.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache
    Individual Contributor License Agreement.

@swegner swegner changed the title Add labels for SDK display data [BEAM-117] Add labels for SDK display data May 16, 2016
@swegner
Copy link
Contributor Author

swegner commented May 16, 2016

R: @bjchambers

.withLabel("Output File Suffix"),
"")
.addIfNotDefault(DisplayData.item("numShards", numShards)
.withLabel("Maximum Shard Count"),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"Maximum output shards"?

@bjchambers
Copy link
Contributor

A few comments, then LGTM once tests pass.

@swegner swegner force-pushed the displaydata-labels branch from bbe2026 to 472dd41 Compare May 16, 2016 18:20
@swegner
Copy link
Contributor Author

swegner commented May 16, 2016

tests are green, @bjchambers ready to merge

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 638cc20 May 16, 2016
@swegner
Copy link
Contributor Author

swegner commented May 16, 2016

Backport: GoogleCloudPlatform/DataflowJavaSDK#230

@swegner swegner deleted the displaydata-labels branch May 19, 2016 17:30
dhalperi pushed a commit to dhalperi/beam that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2016
iemejia pushed a commit to iemejia/beam that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2018
pl04351820 pushed a commit to pl04351820/beam that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants