Skip to content

Conversation

@akashorabek
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixes #30683
Reverts #35202
Successful run example: https://github.com/akashorabek/beam/actions/runs/15685138523


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, comment fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER> instead.
  • Update CHANGES.md with noteworthy changes.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.

To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md

GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)

Build python source distribution and wheels
Python tests
Java tests
Go tests

See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@akashorabek akashorabek requested a review from Abacn June 16, 2025 18:39
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Assigning reviewers:

R: @jrmccluskey for label go.

Note: If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@Abacn
Copy link
Contributor

Abacn commented Jun 17, 2025

cc: @shunping

Let's merge this and see if master becomes stable?

@shunping shunping merged commit 71073a0 into apache:master Jun 17, 2025
9 of 11 checks passed
@shunping
Copy link
Collaborator

shunping commented Jun 17, 2025

It would be surprising to see that experimental flag, which is not enabled by default, is causing this flakiness.

shunping added a commit to shunping/beam that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
shunping added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
* Revert "Reverts #35202 (#35306)"

This reverts commit 71073a0.

* Check if type assertion is ok before using it in range.

* Trigger PreCommit Java test.
shunping pushed a commit to shunping/beam that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
shunping added a commit to shunping/beam that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
* Revert "Reverts apache#35202 (apache#35306)"

This reverts commit 71073a0.

* Check if type assertion is ok before using it in range.

* Trigger PreCommit Java test.
shunping added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
* Reverts #35202 (#35306)

* Fix flaky precommit java test on prism caused by PR 35202 (#35336)

* Revert "Reverts #35202 (#35306)"

This reverts commit 71073a0.

* Check if type assertion is ok before using it in range.

* Trigger PreCommit Java test.

---------

Co-authored-by: akashorabek <70029317+akashorabek@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The PreCommit Java job is flaky

3 participants