-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
30813 make tests deterministic #35889
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @A1K28, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request significantly enhances the determinism and stability of tests, particularly integration tests that rely on Docker-in-Docker (DinD) environments. It introduces a new GitHub Action for robust DinD setup and teardown, alongside comprehensive Python test configuration changes to enforce sequential execution, manage RPC timeouts, and ensure clean test states. These changes are crucial for reducing flaky test failures and ensuring consistent test results across different environments, ultimately improving the reliability of the CI/CD pipeline.
Highlights
- New GitHub Action for Docker-in-Docker (DinD) Management: A new composite GitHub Action (
dind-up-action/action.yml) has been introduced to standardize and robustly manage Docker-in-Docker (DinD) environments for CI/CD. This action handles DinD container lifecycle, volume management, health checks, and port mapping verification, ensuring a consistent and reliable test setup. - Enhanced Test Determinism and Stability Configuration: Extensive
pytestfixtures have been added toconftest.pyto enforce deterministic test execution. This includes configuring gRPC timeouts, forcing single bundle processing, ensuring deterministic element ordering, limiting worker parallelism, and crucially, forcing sequential pytest execution (PYTEST_XDIST_WORKER_COUNT=1) to prevent race conditions and flakiness. - Milvus Docker Image Version Downgrade: The Milvus Docker image version used in integration tests (
milvus_search_it_test.py) has been downgraded fromv2.5.10tov2.3.9. This change likely addresses stability or compatibility issues encountered with the newer version in the automated test environment. - Improved Test Environment Variable Management: The
tox.iniconfiguration has been updated to properly pass through and set environment variables related to Docker and Testcontainers (DOCKER_*,TESTCONTAINERS_*,TC_*). This ensures that the newly introduced DinD and test stability configurations are correctly applied within the Python test environments.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
44d8715 to
6b664b2
Compare
|
R: @Abacn |
|
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
Abacn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, this LGTM! Letting checks complete before merging
|
Looks like there are still some flakes in coverage, but I think this PR is still a step in the right direction |
Yeah, so the workflow fails here because it does not use the updated workflow to set up DinD. I am not sure why this happens in the PR. |
|
Oh, it is because GitHub doesn't pick up workflow changes until they're submitted. So it should start running with those changes now |
|
I see, thanks! that's good to know. |
* make py39-cloudcoverage deterministic (apache#30813) * increase grpc timeouts (apache#30813) * fix linting (apache#30813) * revert timeout increase (apache#30813)

Fixes #30813
This PR addresses a few issues for the beam_PreCommit_Python_Coverage workflow:
All of my runs were successful except for one, that i got for overloading downstream, which only happened because i ran 8 workflows in parallel: https://github.com/A1K28/beam/actions/workflows/beam_PreCommit_Python_Coverage.yml?query=branch%3Acoverage-v6
This PR should fix most of (if not all) flakiness in the workflow runs. As a side effect, the workflow run will take longer, however it was necessary to disable parallelism to fix a lot of flaky issues.
IMPORTANT: The python coverage workflow fails here because it does not use the updated workflow to set up DinD. I am not sure why this happens. Here is the actual run: https://github.com/A1K28/beam/actions/runs/17007645420
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.