Skip to content

Conversation

@udim
Copy link
Member

@udim udim commented Sep 20, 2019

cherrypick of #9563


Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:

  • Choose reviewer(s) and mention them in a comment (R: @username).
  • Format the pull request title like [BEAM-XXX] Fixes bug in ApproximateQuantiles, where you replace BEAM-XXX with the appropriate JIRA issue, if applicable. This will automatically link the pull request to the issue.
  • If this contribution is large, please file an Apache Individual Contributor License Agreement.

Post-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

Lang SDK Apex Dataflow Flink Gearpump Samza Spark
Go Build Status --- --- Build Status --- --- Build Status
Java Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status Build Status Build Status
Build Status
Python Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
Build Status
--- Build Status
Build Status
Build Status --- --- Build Status
XLang --- --- --- Build Status --- --- ---

Pre-Commit Tests Status (on master branch)

--- Java Python Go Website
Non-portable Build Status Build Status Build Status Build Status
Portable --- Build Status --- ---

See .test-infra/jenkins/README for trigger phrase, status and link of all Jenkins jobs.

Bug was introduced in the conversion to inspect.signature, and manifests
as assigning a wrapper function that accepts a single positional
argument when the wrapped function can accept an arbitrary number.
@udim
Copy link
Member Author

udim commented Sep 20, 2019

R: @markflyhigh

@markflyhigh
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@markflyhigh
Copy link
Contributor

The docs task failure is being handled in #9620. Cython failure is not related to this change and integration test is caused by dataflow service. This change is fully tested when merging to master so should be safe to cherry-pick.

@markflyhigh markflyhigh merged commit f4171eb into apache:release-2.16.0 Sep 20, 2019
@markflyhigh markflyhigh requested review from markflyhigh and removed request for markflyhigh September 20, 2019 04:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants