just installed v3.0 and can't get a logged in user to access their doc
test:
C:\Users\cliff>curl -X POST http://192.168.1.25:5984/_session -d "name=sally.user&password=pw"
returns
{"ok":true,"name":"sally.user","roles":["user","supervisor"]}
C:\Users\cliff>curl -X GET http://192.168.1.25:5984/_users/org.couchdb.user:sally.user
returns
{"error":"unauthorized","reason":"You are not authorized to access this db."}
this is a basic install of v3.0. I created server admins, then created _users table in fauxton. Added users in the usual fashion and the docs seem fine. I ran into this building a login component in angular. I get the same result using angular's HttpClient - login works fine, GET after logging in returns 403. Angular's HttpClient has withCredentials = true as an option, and this has been working fine in couch v2.3
I have tested this against require_valid_user both true and false - same result.
any help would be appreciated here: am I doing something lame...? Do I need some configuration set...? Or is this a bug...?
just installed v3.0 and can't get a logged in user to access their doc
test:
C:\Users\cliff>curl -X POST http://192.168.1.25:5984/_session -d "name=sally.user&password=pw"
returns
{"ok":true,"name":"sally.user","roles":["user","supervisor"]}
C:\Users\cliff>curl -X GET http://192.168.1.25:5984/_users/org.couchdb.user:sally.user
returns
{"error":"unauthorized","reason":"You are not authorized to access this db."}
this is a basic install of v3.0. I created server admins, then created _users table in fauxton. Added users in the usual fashion and the docs seem fine. I ran into this building a login component in angular. I get the same result using angular's HttpClient - login works fine, GET after logging in returns 403. Angular's HttpClient has withCredentials = true as an option, and this has been working fine in couch v2.3
I have tested this against require_valid_user both true and false - same result.
any help would be appreciated here: am I doing something lame...? Do I need some configuration set...? Or is this a bug...?