Skip to content

Conversation

@viirya
Copy link
Member

@viirya viirya commented Mar 5, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #167.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

Comment on lines +37 to +48
test("coalesce should return correct datatype") {
Seq(true, false).foreach { dictionaryEnabled =>
withTempDir { dir =>
val path = new Path(dir.toURI.toString, "test.parquet")
makeParquetFileAllTypes(path, dictionaryEnabled = dictionaryEnabled, 10000)
withParquetTable(path.toString, "tbl") {
checkSparkAnswerAndOperator(
"SELECT coalesce(cast(_18 as date), cast(_19 as date), _20) FROM tbl")
}
}
}
}
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Due to the issue apache/datafusion#9458, the return type and the actual output array is different in DataFusion coalesce function:

  org.apache.spark.SparkException: Job aborted due to stage failure: Task 0 in stage 2.0 failed 1 times, most recent failure: Lost task 0.0 in stage 2.0 (TID 2) (192.168.86.44 executor driver): org.apache.comet.CometNativeException
: Arrow error: Invalid argument error: column types must match schema types, expected Utf8 but found Date32 at column index 0                                                                                                          
        at org.apache.comet.Native.executePlan(Native Method)                                                      
        at org.apache.comet.CometExecIterator.executeNative(CometExecIterator.scala:65)
        at org.apache.comet.CometExecIterator.getNextBatch(CometExecIterator.scala:111)
        at org.apache.comet.CometExecIterator.hasNext(CometExecIterator.scala:126)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.columnartorow_nextBatch_0$(Unknown Source)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIteratorForCodegenStage1.processNext(Unknown Source)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.BufferedRowIterator.hasNext(BufferedRowIterator.java:43)
        at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.WholeStageCodegenExec$$anon$1.hasNext(WholeStageCodegenExec.scala:760)

Comment on lines +1504 to +1506
// TODO: Remove this once we have new DataFusion release which includes
// the fix: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/9459
castToProto(None, a.dataType, childExpr)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a workaround for now before we have new DataFusion release that includes the fix: apache/datafusion#9459

@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Mar 5, 2024

cc @sunchao

Copy link
Member

@sunchao sunchao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@viirya viirya merged commit 9a58880 into apache:main Mar 5, 2024
@viirya
Copy link
Member Author

viirya commented Mar 5, 2024

Merged. Thanks.

@viirya viirya deleted the fix_coalesce branch March 5, 2024 21:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

coalesce function returns incorrect result

2 participants