Skip to content

fix: Use the number of rows from underlying arrays instead of logical row count from RecordBatch#972

Merged
viirya merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
viirya:fix_record_batch_row_count
Sep 27, 2024
Merged

fix: Use the number of rows from underlying arrays instead of logical row count from RecordBatch#972
viirya merged 1 commit intoapache:mainfrom
viirya:fix_record_batch_row_count

Conversation

@viirya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@viirya viirya commented Sep 26, 2024

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #973.

Rationale for this change

What changes are included in this PR?

How are these changes tested?

@viirya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

viirya commented Sep 26, 2024

cc @huaxingao

@viirya viirya force-pushed the fix_record_batch_row_count branch 2 times, most recently from b111bba to 0421432 Compare September 26, 2024 19:36
@viirya viirya force-pushed the fix_record_batch_row_count branch from 0421432 to e9ec65b Compare September 26, 2024 20:27
@viirya viirya changed the title fix: Use logical row count from RecordBatch fix: Use the number of rows from underlying arrays instead of logical row count from RecordBatch Sep 26, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@huaxingao huaxingao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@viirya viirya merged commit 317a534 into apache:main Sep 27, 2024
@viirya
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

viirya commented Sep 27, 2024

Merged. Thanks @huaxingao

@viirya viirya deleted the fix_record_batch_row_count branch September 27, 2024 07:21
coderfender pushed a commit to coderfender/datafusion-comet that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
## Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax. For example
`Closes apache#123` indicates that this PR will close issue apache#123.
-->

N/A

## Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->

Apply OSS 0.3.0 changes.

## What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->

```
84cccf7 docs: Add notes for IntelliJ code size limits for code inspections. (apache#985)
dcc4a8a fix: The spilled_bytes metric of CometSortExec should be size instead of time (apache#984)
f64553b chore: fix compatibility guide (apache#978)
0ee7df8 chore: Enable additional CreateArray tests (apache#928)
a690e9d perf: Remove one redundant CopyExec for SMJ (apache#962)
a8156b5 chore: update rem expression guide (apache#976)
317a534 fix: Use the number of rows from underlying arrays instead of logical row count from RecordBatch (apache#972)
22561c4 doc: add documentation interlinks (apache#975)
b4de8e0 chore: Update benchmarks results based on 0.3.0-rc1 (apache#969)
94093f3 chore: fix publish-to-maven script (apache#966)
f31f6cc Generate changelog for 0.3.0 release (apache#964)
5663fc2 fix: div and rem by negative zero (apache#960)
50517f6 perf: Optimize decimal precision check in decimal aggregates (sum and avg) (apache#952)
5b3f7bc fix: CometScanExec on Spark 3.5.2 (apache#915)
8410c71 chore: clarify tarball installation (apache#959)
459b2b0 fix: window function range offset should be long instead of int (apache#733)
```


## How are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Java Arrow RecordBatch might have logical row count which is not same as physical row count in the arrays

2 participants