-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
Deprecate LexOrderingRef and LexRequirementRef
#13205
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… `unwrap_or` to `unwrap_or_default`.
…LexOrdering and LexOrderingRef.
Co-authored-by: Berkay Şahin <124376117+berkaysynnada@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
Author
|
Will break this PR up to make it smaller |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
core
Core DataFusion crate
functions
Changes to functions implementation
optimizer
Optimizer rules
physical-expr
Changes to the physical-expr crates
proto
Related to proto crate
sqllogictest
SQL Logic Tests (.slt)
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Draft as it builds on #13146
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
Nnow that LexOrdering and LexRequirement are actual structs thanks to @ngli-me and @berkaysynnada on #13146, we can refer to their references as
&LexOrderingand&LexRequirementdirectly rather than going through a type alias.This is significantly less confusing than the current situation where we have both
LexOrderingandLexOrderingRefandLexRequirementandLexRequirementRefChanges:
LexRequirementRef&LexOrderingand&LexRequirementdirectlyWhat changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?