benchmark: Support sort_tpch10 for benchmark

[zhuqi-lucas]

Which issue does this PR close?

Currently we only have sort_tpch for benchmark, recently when optimizing sort, i found sort_tpch10 will show more stable result sometimes, so i added this to benchmark script also.

cc @alamb @Dandandan

Rationale for this change

Sometimes, i found sort_tpch10 will get the more accurate or good result when we optimize the merge part, because our in_mem sort buffer is 1MB, so the sort_tpch will have less count for merge compare count, i added the sort_tpch10 to bench.sh, hope it will be helpful.

Currently we only have sort_tpch for benchmark, recently when optimizing sort, i found sort_tpch10 will show more stable result sometimes, so i added this to benchmark script also.

What changes are included in this PR?

Sometimes, i found sort_tpch10 will get the more accurate or good result when we optimize the merge part, because our in_mem sort buffer is 1MB, so the sort_tpch will have less count for merge compare count, i added the sort_tpch10 to bench.sh, hope it will be helpful.

Currently we only have sort_tpch for benchmark, recently when optimizing sort, i found sort_tpch10 will show more stable result sometimes, so i added this to benchmark script also.

Are these changes tested?

Yes

./bench.sh run sort_tpch10
***************************
DataFusion Benchmark Script
COMMAND: run
BENCHMARK: sort_tpch10
QUERY: All
DATAFUSION_DIR: /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/..
BRANCH_NAME: sort_tpch_10_benchmark_support
DATA_DIR: /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/data
RESULTS_DIR: /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/results/sort_tpch_10_benchmark_support
CARGO_COMMAND: cargo run --release
PREFER_HASH_JOIN: true
***************************
RESULTS_FILE: /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/results/sort_tpch_10_benchmark_support/sort_tpch10.json
Running sort tpch benchmark...
+ cargo run --release --bin dfbench -- sort-tpch --iterations 5 --path /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/data/tpch_sf10 -o /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/results/sort_tpch_10_benchmark_support/sort_tpch10.json
    Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.35s
     Running `/Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/target/release/dfbench sort-tpch --iterations 5 --path /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/data/tpch_sf10 -o /Users/zhuqi/arrow-datafusion/benchmarks/results/sort_tpch_10_benchmark_support/sort_tpch10.json`
Q1 iteration 0 took 1554.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q1 iteration 1 took 1532.3 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q1 iteration 2 took 1518.5 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q1 iteration 3 took 1528.3 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q1 iteration 4 took 1533.0 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q1 avg time: 1533.22 ms
Q2 iteration 0 took 1406.7 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q2 iteration 1 took 1431.7 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q2 iteration 2 took 1398.6 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q2 iteration 3 took 1394.7 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q2 iteration 4 took 1414.2 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q2 avg time: 1409.18 ms
Q3 iteration 0 took 6564.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q3 iteration 1 took 6535.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q3 iteration 2 took 6638.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q3 iteration 3 took 6677.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q3 iteration 4 took 6712.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q3 avg time: 6625.86 ms
Q4 iteration 0 took 1963.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q4 iteration 1 took 1967.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q4 iteration 2 took 1931.0 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q4 iteration 3 took 1925.3 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q4 iteration 4 took 1946.5 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q4 avg time: 1946.88 ms
Q5 iteration 0 took 2431.6 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q5 iteration 1 took 2472.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q5 iteration 2 took 2504.5 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q5 iteration 3 took 2485.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q5 iteration 4 took 2350.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q5 avg time: 2449.12 ms
Q6 iteration 0 took 2623.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q6 iteration 1 took 2580.0 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q6 iteration 2 took 2622.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q6 iteration 3 took 2622.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q6 iteration 4 took 2579.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q6 avg time: 2605.76 ms
Q7 iteration 0 took 4385.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q7 iteration 1 took 4385.7 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q7 iteration 2 took 4233.3 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q7 iteration 3 took 4209.4 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q7 iteration 4 took 4233.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q7 avg time: 4289.63 ms
Q8 iteration 0 took 2797.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q8 iteration 1 took 2781.4 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q8 iteration 2 took 2882.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q8 iteration 3 took 2784.8 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q8 iteration 4 took 2883.5 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q8 avg time: 2825.80 ms
Q9 iteration 0 took 2897.6 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q9 iteration 1 took 3006.3 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q9 iteration 2 took 2968.0 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q9 iteration 3 took 2965.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q9 iteration 4 took 2964.7 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q9 avg time: 2960.51 ms
Q10 iteration 0 took 7662.0 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q10 iteration 1 took 7396.4 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q10 iteration 2 took 8013.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q10 iteration 3 took 7553.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q10 iteration 4 took 6845.6 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q10 avg time: 7494.20 ms
Q11 iteration 0 took 3567.1 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q11 iteration 1 took 3424.9 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q11 iteration 2 took 3425.2 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q11 iteration 3 took 3375.3 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q11 iteration 4 took 3357.2 ms and returned 59986052 rows
Q11 avg time: 3429.94 ms
+ set +x
Done

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

[alamb]

🚀

[alamb]

Thanks @zhuqi-lucas and @Dandandan