-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[Enhancement](load) optimize flush policy to avoid small segments #12706
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
HappenLee
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2022
Contributor
HappenLee
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Contributor
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
Contributor
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
dataroaring
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2022
Contributor
dataroaring
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
morningman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 21, 2022
In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
zhannngchen
added a commit
to zhannngchen/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 23, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
FreeOnePlus
pushed a commit
to FreeOnePlus/doris
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2022
…che#12706 In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Proposed changes
Issue Number: close #xxx
Problem summary
In current policy, if mem-limit exceeded, load channel will pick tablets that consume most memory, but mem_consumption contains memory in flush, if some delta writer flushing a full memtable(default 200MB), the current memtable might be very small, we should avoid flush such memtable, which can generate a very small segment.
Checklist(Required)
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...