Skip to content

Conversation

@xinyiZzz
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Issue Number: close #xxx

Problem summary

fix #13398

*** Query id: 0-0 ***
*** Aborted at 1665994546 (unix time) try "date -d @1665994546" if you are using GNU date ***
*** Current BE git commitID: e84d9a6c8 ***
*** SIGSEGV address not mapped to object (@0x60) received by PID 3907460 (TID 0x7f8f9487e700) from PID 96; stack trace: ***
 0# doris::signal::(anonymous namespace)::FailureSignalHandler(int, siginfo_t*, void*) at /mnt/disk1/liyifan/doris/core/be/src/common/signal_handler.h:420
 1# 0x00007F8F97CAEB20 in /lib64/libc.so.6
 2# void doris::destroy<doris::ThreadContext>(void*) at /mnt/disk1/liyifan/doris/core/be/src/runtime/threadlocal.h:122
 3# doris::invoke_destructors(void*) at /mnt/disk1/liyifan/doris/core/be/src/runtime/threadlocal.cc:53
 4# __nptl_deallocate_tsd.part.8 in /lib64/libpthread.so.0
 5# start_thread in /lib64/libpthread.so.0
 6# clone in /lib64/libc.so.6

Checklist(Required)

  1. Does it affect the original behavior:
    • Yes
    • No
    • I don't know
  2. Has unit tests been added:
    • Yes
    • No
    • No Need
  3. Has document been added or modified:
    • Yes
    • No
    • No Need
  4. Does it need to update dependencies:
    • Yes
    • No
  5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back:
    • Yes (If Yes, please explain WHY)
    • No

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@xinyiZzz xinyiZzz closed this Oct 17, 2022
@xinyiZzz
Copy link
Contributor Author

abandoned

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant