fix cooldown timestamp bug #3336
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
|
LGTM |
kangkaisen
reviewed
Apr 16, 2020
| hasCooldown = true; | ||
| DateLiteral dateLiteral = new DateLiteral(value, Type.DATETIME); | ||
| coolDownTimeStamp = dateLiteral.getLongValue(); | ||
| coolDownTimeStamp = dateLiteral.unixTimestamp(TimeUtils.getTimeZone()); |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please add a UT for this bug
when add a parition with storage_cooldown_time property like this:
alter table tablexxx ADD PARTITION p20200421 VALUES LESS THAN("1588262400") ("storage_medium" = "SSD", "storage_cooldown_time" = "2020-05-01 00:00:00");
and show partitions from tablexxx;
the CooldownTime is wrong: 2610-02-17 10:16:40, and what is more, the storage migration is based on the wrong timestamp.
The reason is that the result of DateLiteral.getLongValue is not timestamp.
kangpinghuang
force-pushed
the
fix_cool_down_timestamp_bug
branch
from
39434ff to
3672a23
Compare
wangbo
added a commit
to wangbo/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2020
wangbo
added a commit
to wangbo/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2020
acelyc111
pushed a commit
to acelyc111/incubator-doris
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 20, 2021
when add a parition with storage_cooldown_time property like this:
alter table tablexxx ADD PARTITION p20200421 VALUES LESS THAN("1588262400") ("storage_medium" = "SSD", "storage_cooldown_time" = "2020-05-01 00:00:00");
and show partitions from tablexxx;
the CooldownTime is wrong: 2610-02-17 10:16:40, and what is more, the storage migration is based on the wrong timestamp.
The reason is that the result of DateLiteral.getLongValue is not timestamp.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
when add a parition with storage_cooldown_time property like this:
alter table tablexxx ADD PARTITION p20200421 VALUES LESS THAN("1588262400") ("storage_medium" = "SSD", "storage_cooldown_time" = "2020-05-01 00:00:00");
and show partitions from tablexxx;
the CooldownTime is wrong: 2610-02-17 10:16:40, and what is more, the storage migration is based on the wrong timestamp.
The reason is that the result of DateLiteral.getLongValue is not timestamp.