-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
[Fix](Json type) correct cast result for json type #34764
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris. Since 2024-03-18, the Document has been moved to doris-website. |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
run buildall |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
1 similar comment
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
TPC-H: Total hot run time: 41964 ms |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 186599 ms |
| type_index == TypeIndex::Int64 || | ||
| type_index == TypeIndex::Int128) { | ||
| if (value->isInt()) { | ||
| res[i] = ((const JsonbIntVal*)value)->val(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will it cause wrong result, eg int64 -> int8 ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the same as cast bigint to tinyint
xiaokang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
|
PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested. |
|
PR approved by anyone and no changes requested. |
TPC-DS: Total hot run time: 188971 ms |
ClickBench: Total hot run time: 30.55 s |
|
run buildall |
|
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍" |
|
TeamCity be ut coverage result: |
qidaye
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Proposed changes
Will result behavior change
Issue Number: close #xxx
Further comments
If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...