Skip to content

Conversation

@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor

@Mryange Mryange commented Nov 8, 2024

Proposed changes

#38755
test

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                         Time             CPU   Iterations
-------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_matchIPv6SubnetSSE          1.89 ns         1.89 ns   1000000000
BM_matchIPv6SubnetNative       4.99 ns         4.99 ns    561455254

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

## Proposed changes

test
```
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark                         Time             CPU   Iterations
-------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_matchIPv6SubnetSSE          1.89 ns         1.89 ns   1000000000
BM_matchIPv6SubnetNative       4.99 ns         4.99 ns    561455254
```
@doris-robot
Copy link

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mryange commented Nov 8, 2024

run buildall

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@doris-robot
Copy link

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.31% (9463/26061)
Line Coverage: 27.85% (77883/279677)
Region Coverage: 26.52% (39964/150706)
Branch Coverage: 23.30% (20294/87106)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/389bd000f709967f27da3ab31b873314ebc0fb10_389bd000f709967f27da3ab31b873314ebc0fb10/report/index.html

@Mryange
Copy link
Contributor Author

Mryange commented Nov 11, 2024

run p0

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit dc9ec5b into apache:branch-2.1 Nov 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants