Skip to content

Conversation

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor

@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt commented Nov 27, 2024

pick #44408 #43078

)

In ##41667 we support ignore filter
partitial, however, when sync_filter_size is turned off, the final
filter may only contain part of the data because some filters are judged
to be 'in'.
For example:
there are rf001(2 instances, in_or_bloom),rf000(2 instances, min_max),
instance_1 has 1e8 row and rf001 change to bloom, the rf000 will not
ignored
instance_2 has 1 row and rf001 change to in, the rf000 will ignored
finally, rf000 applied and make wrong result
@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt changed the title [Bug](runtime-filter) avoid wrong partitial ignore minmax filter (#43… [Bug](runtime-filter) pick #44408 #43078 Nov 27, 2024
@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt merged commit ddaaac5 into branch-2.1 Nov 28, 2024
14 of 17 checks passed
@BiteTheDDDDt BiteTheDDDDt deleted the cp_1127_2 branch December 17, 2024 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants