Skip to content

Conversation

@kaka11chen
Copy link
Contributor

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

Cherry-pick #50358

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

…failing to access repeatedly when late materialization occurs.
@kaka11chen kaka11chen requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner May 7, 2025 07:14
@Thearas
Copy link
Contributor

Thearas commented May 7, 2025

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@kaka11chen
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@kaka11chen kaka11chen changed the title [Fix] Fixed issue with top level struct column having present stream failing to access repeatedly when late materialization occurs. [Fix](orc-reader) Fixed issue with top level struct column having present stream failing to access repeatedly when late materialization occurs. May 7, 2025
@doris-robot
Copy link

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 38.87% (10279/26442)
Line Coverage 29.92% (85370/285368)
Region Coverage 28.58% (44023/154038)
Branch Coverage 25.31% (22516/88978)

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

BE Regression && UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 76.11% (19827/26052)
Line Coverage 71.54% (202860/283575)
Region Coverage 69.24% (124192/179353)
Branch Coverage 62.47% (62872/100636)

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit e64e5bc into apache:branch-2.1 May 7, 2025
20 of 22 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants