Skip to content

Conversation

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor

Related PR: #58785

Problem Summary:
The performance rollback was introduced in #58785. The reason is that, prior to #58785, reading ordinary columns did not require filling and saving the RL DL. #58785 combined the logic for reading ordinary columns from a struct with the logic for reading ordinary columns, and filled and saved the RL DL to populate the null map information of the struct. This PR re-separates the reading logic.

…en reading Parquet scalar columns. (apache#59833)

Related PR: apache#58785

Problem Summary:
The performance rollback was introduced in apache#58785. The reason is that,
prior to apache#58785, reading ordinary columns did not require filling and
saving the RL DL. apache#58785 combined the logic for reading ordinary columns
from a struct with the logic for reading ordinary columns, and filled
and saved the RL DL to populate the null map information of the struct.
This PR re-separates the reading logic.
@hubgeter hubgeter requested a review from yiguolei as a code owner January 22, 2026 02:37
@hello-stephen
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hubgeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

run buildall

@doris-robot
Copy link

BE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 80.00% (20/25) 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 52.72% (18899/35848)
Line Coverage 35.83% (175471/489674)
Region Coverage 32.48% (135761/417994)
Branch Coverage 33.34% (58862/176548)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Jan 22, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@yiguolei yiguolei merged commit 36d4e58 into apache:branch-4.0 Jan 22, 2026
24 of 26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants