Skip to content

Conversation

@yangzhg
Copy link
Member

@yangzhg yangzhg commented Feb 7, 2022

Problem Summary:

fix ltrim result may incorrect in some case
according to https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html
Built-in Function: int __builtin_cl/tz (unsigned int x)
If x is 0, the result is undefined.
So we handle the case of 0 separately

this function return different between gcc and clang when x is 0

Checklist(Required)

  1. Does it affect the original behavior: (Yes)
  2. Has unit tests been added: (Yes)
  3. Has document been added or modified: (No Need)
  4. Does it need to update dependencies: (No)
  5. Are there any changes that cannot be rolled back: (No)

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion at dev@doris.apache.org by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@xinghuayu007
Copy link
Contributor

please add some unit tests for case: __builtin_cl/tz (0)

@amosbird
Copy link
Contributor

amosbird commented Feb 7, 2022

Similar fixes has been done in #7712 , which was caught by current unit tests. It's an indication that test coverage should be improved.

@yangzhg
Copy link
Member Author

yangzhg commented Feb 7, 2022

please add some unit tests for case: __builtin_cl/tz (0)

Unit test has already contained this situation

@yangzhg
Copy link
Member Author

yangzhg commented Feb 7, 2022

Similar fixes has been done in #7712 , which was caught by current unit tests. It's an indication that test coverage should be improved.

I see, this is in another function, we may merge the those implements together

@xinghuayu007
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@morningman morningman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@github-actions github-actions bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. label Feb 8, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2022

PR approved by at least one committer and no changes requested.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2022

PR approved by anyone and no changes requested.

@morningman morningman merged commit 5029ef4 into apache:master Feb 9, 2022
@yangzhg yangzhg deleted the fix_trim branch February 14, 2022 01:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by one committer. reviewed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants